Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Montenegro
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 100.27 t against 83.83 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 16.44 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 164th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133.86 t | 145.15 t | 11.28 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 106.91 t | 122.95 t | 16.03 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 104.12 t | 78.04 t | 26.09 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Montenegro or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Montenegro, at 100.27 t against 83.83 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 16.44 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Montenegro ranks 164th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).