Myanmar vs Spain: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Myanmar
- Spain
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 132,300 t against 108,840 t in Spain, a difference of 23,460 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Myanmar ranks 25th and Spain ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,350 t | 71,381 t | 43,032 t | Spain |
| 1970s | 33,358 t | 89,700 t | 56,341 t | Spain |
| 1980s | 53,432 t | 113,918 t | 60,486 t | Spain |
| 1990s | 66,429 t | 121,741 t | 55,312 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 122,785 t | 147,961 t | 25,176 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 143,647 t | 157,262 t | 13,615 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 135,157 t | 153,656 t | 18,499 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Myanmar or Spain?
- Myanmar, at 132,300 t against 108,840 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Myanmar and Spain?
- 23,460 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Spain rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Myanmar ranks 25th and Spain ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).