Nicaragua vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nicaragua
- South Sudan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 7,966 t against 7,705 t in South Sudan, a difference of 261 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 103rd and South Sudan ranks 105th of 185 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,679 t | 6,373 t | 1,306 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 8,358 t | 7,172 t | 1,186 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Nicaragua or South Sudan?
- Nicaragua, at 7,966 t against 7,705 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 261 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Nicaragua ranks 103rd and South Sudan ranks 105th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).