Pakistan vs Türkiye: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Pakistan
- Türkiye
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 296,517 t against 261,066 t in Türkiye, a difference of 35,451 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Pakistan ranks 15th and Türkiye ranks 16th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Türkiye in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 59,254 t | 87,610 t | 28,355 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 86,413 t | 121,278 t | 34,865 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 125,653 t | 157,781 t | 32,128 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 172,570 t | 185,517 t | 12,946 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 215,947 t | 201,402 t | 14,544 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 248,884 t | 224,232 t | 24,652 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 268,397 t | 245,644 t | 22,753 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Pakistan or Türkiye?
- Pakistan, at 296,517 t against 261,066 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Pakistan and Türkiye?
- 35,451 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Pakistan and Türkiye rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Pakistan ranks 15th and Türkiye ranks 16th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).