Paraguay vs Yugoslav SFR: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Paraguay
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 91,684 t against 77,474 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 14,210 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 32nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 35th of 201 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,037 t | 48,752 t | 45,715 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 7,007 t | 59,768 t | 52,761 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 16,390 t | 67,133 t | 50,743 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 22,160 t | 69,016 t | 46,856 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Paraguay or Yugoslav SFR?
- Paraguay, at 91,684 t against 77,474 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Paraguay and Yugoslav SFR?
- 14,210 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Paraguay and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Paraguay ranks 32nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 35th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).