Russian Federation vs Viet Nam: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Russian Federation
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 746,592 t against 191,804 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 554,788 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 3.9 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 350,000 t | 98,803 t | 251,197 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 382,060 t | 143,490 t | 238,570 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 508,558 t | 184,366 t | 324,192 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 709,868 t | 189,299 t | 520,569 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Russian Federation or Viet Nam?
- Russian Federation, at 746,592 t against 191,804 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Russian Federation and Viet Nam?
- 554,788 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Viet Nam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Viet Nam rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Russian Federation ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).