Angola vs Kenya: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Angola
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 22.33 kg/ha against 21.21 kg/ha in Angola, a difference of 1.12 kg/ha.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Angola ranks 94th and Kenya ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.33 kg/ha | 7.32 kg/ha | 1.99 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1970s | 5.5 kg/ha | 9.54 kg/ha | 4.04 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1980s | 4 kg/ha | 11.29 kg/ha | 7.28 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1990s | 5.17 kg/ha | 13.73 kg/ha | 8.56 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 12.92 kg/ha | 17.71 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 17.58 kg/ha | 19.64 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 19.78 kg/ha | 21.24 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Angola or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 22.33 kg/ha against 21.21 kg/ha in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Angola and Kenya?
- 1.12 kg/ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Kenya rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Angola ranks 94th and Kenya ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).