Argentina vs Pakistan: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Pakistan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 20.62 kg/ha against 20.42 kg/ha in Pakistan, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 98th and Pakistan ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.6 kg/ha | 4.19 kg/ha | 3.41 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1970s | 8.75 kg/ha | 5.94 kg/ha | 2.81 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1980s | 12.56 kg/ha | 8.61 kg/ha | 3.95 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1990s | 17.56 kg/ha | 12.2 kg/ha | 5.36 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2000s | 26.77 kg/ha | 15.01 kg/ha | 11.76 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2010s | 31.43 kg/ha | 17.04 kg/ha | 14.39 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2020s | 28.05 kg/ha | 18.26 kg/ha | 9.79 kg/ha | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Argentina or Pakistan?
- Argentina, at 20.62 kg/ha against 20.42 kg/ha in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Argentina and Pakistan?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Pakistan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 98th and Pakistan ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).