Asia vs Guyana: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Asia
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 148.25 kg/ha against 36.67 kg/ha in Asia, a difference of 111.58 kg/ha.
That makes Guyana's figure about 4.0 times Asia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 6th and Guyana ranks 3rd of 32 groups.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.85 kg/ha | 59.4 kg/ha | 49.55 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1970s | 12.64 kg/ha | 60.65 kg/ha | 48.01 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1980s | 15.5 kg/ha | 54.62 kg/ha | 39.12 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1990s | 19.75 kg/ha | 54.18 kg/ha | 34.42 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 2000s | 24.97 kg/ha | 55.67 kg/ha | 30.71 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 2010s | 32.06 kg/ha | 96.84 kg/ha | 64.77 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 2020s | 35.78 kg/ha | 141.67 kg/ha | 105.89 kg/ha | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Asia or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 148.25 kg/ha against 36.67 kg/ha in Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Asia and Guyana?
- 111.58 kg/ha, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Asia and Guyana rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Asia ranks 6th and Guyana ranks 3rd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).