Austria vs India: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Austria
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 35.09 kg/ha against 34.4 kg/ha in Austria, a difference of 0.69 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 52nd and India ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25.65 kg/ha | 6.67 kg/ha | 18.98 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1970s | 26.75 kg/ha | 8.3 kg/ha | 18.45 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1980s | 29.61 kg/ha | 10.4 kg/ha | 19.21 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1990s | 31.07 kg/ha | 15.3 kg/ha | 15.77 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 32.35 kg/ha | 19.62 kg/ha | 12.73 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2010s | 34.08 kg/ha | 29.14 kg/ha | 4.94 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2020s | 35.12 kg/ha | 33.64 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Austria or India?
- India, at 35.09 kg/ha against 34.4 kg/ha in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Austria and India?
- 0.69 kg/ha, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and India?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and India rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Austria ranks 52nd and India ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).