Austria vs Kiribati: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Austria
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 35.76 kg/ha against 34.4 kg/ha in Austria, a difference of 1.36 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 47th and Kiribati ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25.65 kg/ha | 10.3 kg/ha | 15.36 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1970s | 26.75 kg/ha | 11.9 kg/ha | 14.85 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1980s | 29.61 kg/ha | 16.08 kg/ha | 13.53 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1990s | 31.07 kg/ha | 15.85 kg/ha | 15.21 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 32.35 kg/ha | 24.69 kg/ha | 7.66 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2010s | 34.08 kg/ha | 35.09 kg/ha | 1.01 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 35.12 kg/ha | 34.09 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Austria or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 35.76 kg/ha against 34.4 kg/ha in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Austria and Kiribati?
- 1.36 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Kiribati rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Austria ranks 47th and Kiribati ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).