Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 18.2 kg/ha against 17.95 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.25 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 111th and North Macedonia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.07 kg/ha | 12.86 kg/ha | 3.79 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 12.26 kg/ha | 16.7 kg/ha | 4.44 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 14.51 kg/ha | 20.32 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 18.58 kg/ha | 20.07 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or North Macedonia?
- Azerbaijan, at 18.2 kg/ha against 17.95 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
- 0.25 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and North Macedonia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 111th and North Macedonia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).