Azerbaijan vs Suriname: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 18.38 kg/ha against 18.2 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Suriname ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 120th of 201 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.07 kg/ha | 21.85 kg/ha | 12.77 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 12.26 kg/ha | 23.55 kg/ha | 11.29 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 14.51 kg/ha | 29 kg/ha | 14.49 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 18.58 kg/ha | 19.47 kg/ha | 0.8832 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 18.38 kg/ha against 18.2 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Suriname?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Suriname rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 120th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).