Bhutan vs Tuvalu: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 10.42 kg/ha against 10.15 kg/ha in Bhutan, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Bhutan ranks 170th and Tuvalu ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.44 kg/ha | 12.09 kg/ha | 5.65 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 7.04 kg/ha | 8.94 kg/ha | 1.89 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 7.71 kg/ha | 9.58 kg/ha | 1.87 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 8.07 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 0.8153 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 9.98 kg/ha | 8.37 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 16.13 kg/ha | 8.59 kg/ha | 7.54 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 12.64 kg/ha | 10.89 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Bhutan or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 10.42 kg/ha against 10.15 kg/ha in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Bhutan and Tuvalu?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Tuvalu rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 170th and Tuvalu ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).