Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 30.18 kg/ha against 29.87 kg/ha in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 59th and Chile ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.71 kg/ha | 22.86 kg/ha | 13.14 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 10.13 kg/ha | 31.35 kg/ha | 21.22 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 10.61 kg/ha | 34.54 kg/ha | 23.94 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 22.03 kg/ha | 31.34 kg/ha | 9.31 kg/ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?
- Chile, at 30.18 kg/ha against 29.87 kg/ha in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 59th and Chile ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).