Chad vs Tunisia: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chad
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 6.72 kg/ha against 6.12 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.6 kg/ha.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 182nd and Tunisia ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.64 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 3.51 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | 0.3352 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1980s | 3.45 kg/ha | 3.91 kg/ha | 0.4515 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 4.68 kg/ha | 5.55 kg/ha | 0.875 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 5.49 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | 0.3185 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 6.61 kg/ha | 7.08 kg/ha | 0.4729 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 6.42 kg/ha | 7.75 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Chad or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 6.72 kg/ha against 6.12 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Chad and Tunisia?
- 0.6 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Tunisia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chad ranks 182nd and Tunisia ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).