Chile vs Montenegro: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chile
- Montenegro
How they compare
Chile currently reports 30.18 kg/ha against 29.51 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.67 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Chile ranks 63rd and Montenegro ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.3 kg/ha | 51.37 kg/ha | 19.07 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 34.54 kg/ha | 34.54 kg/ha | 0.0015 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 31.34 kg/ha | 31.72 kg/ha | 0.3835 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Montenegro?
- Chile, at 30.18 kg/ha against 29.51 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Montenegro?
- 0.67 kg/ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chile ranks 63rd and Montenegro ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).