Congo vs Ethiopia: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Congo
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 14.76 kg/ha against 14.63 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 139th and Ethiopia ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.57 kg/ha | 6.63 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2000s | 11.94 kg/ha | 8.7 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2010s | 13.87 kg/ha | 13.01 kg/ha | 0.8612 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 14.63 kg/ha | 14.26 kg/ha | 0.3705 kg/ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Congo or Ethiopia?
- Congo, at 14.76 kg/ha against 14.63 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Congo and Ethiopia?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Ethiopia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Congo ranks 139th and Ethiopia ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).