Congo vs Uganda: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Congo
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 15.16 kg/ha against 14.76 kg/ha in Congo, a difference of 0.4 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Congo ranks 128th and Uganda ranks 125th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.12 kg/ha | 11.22 kg/ha | 5.1 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 6.35 kg/ha | 15.62 kg/ha | 9.27 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1980s | 7.46 kg/ha | 11.31 kg/ha | 3.85 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1990s | 9.2 kg/ha | 13.14 kg/ha | 3.94 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 11.94 kg/ha | 14.28 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 13.87 kg/ha | 11.55 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 14.63 kg/ha | 15.37 kg/ha | 0.7369 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Congo or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 15.16 kg/ha against 14.76 kg/ha in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Congo and Uganda?
- 0.4 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Congo ranks 128th and Uganda ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).