Costa Rica vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area

Costa Rica
93.61 kg/ha
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
123.81 kg/ha
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
5th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
4th

Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
255075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 123.81 kg/ha against 93.61 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 30.2 kg/ha.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 5th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 4th of 186 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 21.85 kg/ha 55.08 kg/ha 33.23 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 36.46 kg/ha 51.78 kg/ha 15.32 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 40.85 kg/ha 70.89 kg/ha 30.04 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 69.98 kg/ha 94.41 kg/ha 24.42 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 77.7 kg/ha 112.67 kg/ha 34.96 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 95.17 kg/ha 132.32 kg/ha 37.15 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 93.92 kg/ha 126.09 kg/ha 32.17 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Costa Rica or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 123.81 kg/ha against 93.61 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Costa Rica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
30.2 kg/ha, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
Costa Rica ranks 5th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/costa-rica/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/costa-rica/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Costa Rica vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).