Cyprus vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 11.13 kg/ha against 10.93 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 162nd and Russian Federation ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.66 kg/ha | 5.58 kg/ha | 17.09 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 17.24 kg/ha | 6.09 kg/ha | 11.15 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 14.48 kg/ha | 8.15 kg/ha | 6.33 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 11.96 kg/ha | 10.31 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Cyprus or Russian Federation?
- Cyprus, at 11.13 kg/ha against 10.93 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Cyprus and Russian Federation?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 162nd and Russian Federation ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).