Czechia vs Slovak Republic: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 27.24 kg/ha against 25.78 kg/ha in Slovak Republic, a difference of 1.46 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Slovak Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 69th and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.88 kg/ha | 18.6 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 22.63 kg/ha | 18.46 kg/ha | 4.17 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 26.47 kg/ha | 20.86 kg/ha | 5.61 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 27.76 kg/ha | 24.03 kg/ha | 3.72 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or Slovak Republic?
- Czechia, at 27.24 kg/ha against 25.78 kg/ha in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and Slovak Republic?
- 1.46 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Slovak Republic rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 69th and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).