Czechoslovakia vs New Caledonia: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 20.05 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.46 kg/ha | 27.01 kg/ha | 8.55 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 20.09 kg/ha | 19.09 kg/ha | 0.9981 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 22.01 kg/ha | 13.75 kg/ha | 8.26 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 21.41 kg/ha | 13.07 kg/ha | 8.34 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or New Caledonia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 20.05 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in New Caledonia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and New Caledonia?
- 0 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and New Caledonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and New Caledonia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).