Dominica vs Honduras: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Honduras
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 23.77 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 0.28 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 86th and Honduras ranks 89th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 6 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.23 kg/ha | 8.98 kg/ha | 24.25 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 1970s | 33.14 kg/ha | 11.06 kg/ha | 22.08 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 1980s | 40.59 kg/ha | 11.98 kg/ha | 28.62 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 1990s | 46.5 kg/ha | 12.14 kg/ha | 34.36 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2000s | 25.29 kg/ha | 20.22 kg/ha | 5.06 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2010s | 22.63 kg/ha | 24.19 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2020s | 23.55 kg/ha | 23.33 kg/ha | 0.2257 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Dominica or Honduras?
- Dominica, at 23.77 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Dominica and Honduras?
- 0.28 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Honduras rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 86th and Honduras ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).