Eastern Europe vs Uzbekistan: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eastern Europe
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 50.32 kg/ha against 14.65 kg/ha in Eastern Europe, a difference of 35.67 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 3.4 times Eastern Europe's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.31 kg/ha | 31.02 kg/ha | 21.72 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 9.73 kg/ha | 33.84 kg/ha | 24.11 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 12.57 kg/ha | 42.34 kg/ha | 29.78 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 14.17 kg/ha | 47.42 kg/ha | 33.25 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Eastern Europe or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 50.32 kg/ha against 14.65 kg/ha in Eastern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Eastern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 35.67 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Europe and Uzbekistan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eastern Europe ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).