Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Slovenia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 18.54 kg/ha against 18.48 kg/ha in Slovenia, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th and Slovenia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.61 kg/ha | 26.06 kg/ha | 14.45 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 13.88 kg/ha | 25.72 kg/ha | 11.85 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 17.35 kg/ha | 19.09 kg/ha | 1.74 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 18.49 kg/ha | 19.48 kg/ha | 0.9983 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Equatorial Guinea or Slovenia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 18.54 kg/ha against 18.48 kg/ha in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th and Slovenia ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).