Estonia vs Georgia: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 12.6 kg/ha against 12.08 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.52 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Estonia ranks 159th and Georgia ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.6 kg/ha | 8.79 kg/ha | 2.19 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 9.04 kg/ha | 10.28 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 11.97 kg/ha | 11.11 kg/ha | 0.8645 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 14.25 kg/ha | 13.46 kg/ha | 0.7835 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 12.6 kg/ha against 12.08 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Georgia?
- 0.52 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Georgia rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 159th and Georgia ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).