Eswatini vs Lebanon: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 48.41 kg/ha against 47.36 kg/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 1.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Eswatini ranks 29th and Lebanon ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.14 kg/ha | 16.09 kg/ha | 0.9455 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 23.83 kg/ha | 17.29 kg/ha | 6.55 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 39.6 kg/ha | 23.57 kg/ha | 16.03 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 37.11 kg/ha | 41.18 kg/ha | 4.07 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 40.05 kg/ha | 43.43 kg/ha | 3.38 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 45.99 kg/ha | 47.32 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 47.16 kg/ha | 48.2 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Eswatini or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 48.41 kg/ha against 47.36 kg/ha in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Eswatini and Lebanon?
- 1.05 kg/ha, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Lebanon rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 29th and Lebanon ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).