Fiji vs France: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Fiji
- France
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 33.38 kg/ha against 32.57 kg/ha in France, a difference of 0.81 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 54th and France ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and France in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34.76 kg/ha | 17.41 kg/ha | 17.35 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 34.87 kg/ha | 21.74 kg/ha | 13.13 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 33.97 kg/ha | 26.73 kg/ha | 7.24 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1990s | 29.58 kg/ha | 29.19 kg/ha | 0.3892 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 35.88 kg/ha | 29.67 kg/ha | 6.21 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 26.48 kg/ha | 31.43 kg/ha | 4.96 kg/ha | France |
| 2020s | 30.31 kg/ha | 31.54 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Fiji or France?
- Fiji, at 33.38 kg/ha against 32.57 kg/ha in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Fiji and France?
- 0.81 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and France?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and France rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 54th and France ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).