Fiji vs India: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Fiji
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 35.09 kg/ha against 33.38 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 1.71 kg/ha.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 49th and India ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and India in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34.76 kg/ha | 6.67 kg/ha | 28.09 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 34.87 kg/ha | 8.3 kg/ha | 26.58 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 33.97 kg/ha | 10.4 kg/ha | 23.57 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1990s | 29.58 kg/ha | 15.3 kg/ha | 14.28 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 35.88 kg/ha | 19.62 kg/ha | 16.26 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 26.48 kg/ha | 29.14 kg/ha | 2.67 kg/ha | India |
| 2020s | 30.31 kg/ha | 33.64 kg/ha | 3.33 kg/ha | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Fiji or India?
- India, at 35.09 kg/ha against 33.38 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Fiji and India?
- 1.71 kg/ha, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and India?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and India rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 49th and India ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).