Georgia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 12.6 kg/ha against 12.43 kg/ha in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Georgia ranks 143rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 144th of 186 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.79 kg/ha | 36 kg/ha | 27.21 kg/ha | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 10.28 kg/ha | 31.25 kg/ha | 20.98 kg/ha | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 11.11 kg/ha | 13.43 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 13.46 kg/ha | 13.97 kg/ha | 0.5084 kg/ha | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Georgia, at 12.6 kg/ha against 12.43 kg/ha in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 143rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 144th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).