Germany vs Nauru: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Germany
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 38.94 kg/ha against 37.68 kg/ha in Germany, a difference of 1.26 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.
Germany ranks 47th and Nauru ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 5 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31.75 kg/ha | 25.8 kg/ha | 5.95 kg/ha | Germany |
| 1970s | 32.68 kg/ha | 25.85 kg/ha | 6.82 kg/ha | Germany |
| 1980s | 34.58 kg/ha | 28.41 kg/ha | 6.17 kg/ha | Germany |
| 1990s | 34.24 kg/ha | 30.44 kg/ha | 3.8 kg/ha | Germany |
| 2000s | 36.67 kg/ha | 36.46 kg/ha | 0.209 kg/ha | Germany |
| 2010s | 36.54 kg/ha | 38.73 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | Nauru |
| 2020s | 37.19 kg/ha | 38.75 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Germany or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 38.94 kg/ha against 37.68 kg/ha in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Germany and Nauru?
- 1.26 kg/ha, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Nauru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Nauru rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Germany ranks 47th and Nauru ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).