Honduras vs Hungary: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Honduras
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 23.52 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Honduras ranks 89th and Hungary ranks 88th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Hungary in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.98 kg/ha | 13.06 kg/ha | 4.08 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1970s | 11.06 kg/ha | 16.88 kg/ha | 5.82 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1980s | 11.98 kg/ha | 22.07 kg/ha | 10.1 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1990s | 12.14 kg/ha | 19.26 kg/ha | 7.12 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 20.22 kg/ha | 19.8 kg/ha | 0.4222 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2010s | 24.19 kg/ha | 21.59 kg/ha | 2.6 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2020s | 23.33 kg/ha | 21.2 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Honduras or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 23.52 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Honduras and Hungary?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Hungary rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Honduras ranks 89th and Hungary ranks 88th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).