India vs Kiribati: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- India
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 35.76 kg/ha against 35.09 kg/ha in India, a difference of 0.67 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
India ranks 50th and Kiribati ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.67 kg/ha | 10.3 kg/ha | 3.63 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 8.3 kg/ha | 11.9 kg/ha | 3.6 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 10.4 kg/ha | 16.08 kg/ha | 5.68 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 15.3 kg/ha | 15.85 kg/ha | 0.5562 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 19.62 kg/ha | 24.69 kg/ha | 5.07 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 29.14 kg/ha | 35.09 kg/ha | 5.95 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 33.64 kg/ha | 34.09 kg/ha | 0.4491 kg/ha | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, India or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 35.76 kg/ha against 35.09 kg/ha in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between India and Kiribati?
- 0.67 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do India and Kiribati rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- India ranks 50th and Kiribati ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).