Israel vs Rwanda: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Israel
- Rwanda
How they compare
Israel currently reports 40.28 kg/ha against 39.98 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.3 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Israel ranks 39th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.29 kg/ha | 27.02 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 38.41 kg/ha | 29.83 kg/ha | 8.58 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1980s | 43.58 kg/ha | 32.42 kg/ha | 11.16 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1990s | 36.48 kg/ha | 30.28 kg/ha | 6.2 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 39.15 kg/ha | 32.93 kg/ha | 6.22 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 38.29 kg/ha | 34.25 kg/ha | 4.04 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2020s | 39.95 kg/ha | 37.38 kg/ha | 2.58 kg/ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Israel or Rwanda?
- Israel, at 40.28 kg/ha against 39.98 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Israel and Rwanda?
- 0.3 kg/ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Rwanda rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Israel ranks 39th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).