Kazakhstan vs Libya: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Libya
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.31 kg/ha against 4.72 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.59 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 189th and Libya ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.9 kg/ha | 3.46 kg/ha | 0.5545 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 3.93 kg/ha | 3.93 kg/ha | 0.0011 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 5.3 kg/ha | 4.74 kg/ha | 0.5654 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 5.81 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Libya?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.31 kg/ha against 4.72 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 0.59 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Libya rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 189th and Libya ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).