Kuwait vs World: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kuwait
- World
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 85.57 kg/ha against 28.99 kg/ha in World, a difference of 56.58 kg/ha.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 3.0 times World's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 9th and World ranks 10th of 201 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.55 kg/ha | 9.95 kg/ha | 7.59 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 1970s | 62.61 kg/ha | 12.23 kg/ha | 50.38 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 1980s | 64.75 kg/ha | 14.26 kg/ha | 50.49 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 1990s | 52.73 kg/ha | 16.89 kg/ha | 35.84 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 62.46 kg/ha | 20.66 kg/ha | 41.8 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 96.5 kg/ha | 25.77 kg/ha | 70.73 kg/ha | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 79.97 kg/ha | 28.37 kg/ha | 51.6 kg/ha | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Kuwait or World?
- Kuwait, at 85.57 kg/ha against 28.99 kg/ha in World as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Kuwait and World?
- 56.58 kg/ha, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and World?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and World rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kuwait ranks 9th and World ranks 10th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).