Kyrgyz Republic vs Myanmar: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 19.42 kg/ha against 19.25 kg/ha in Kyrgyz Republic, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
Kyrgyz Republic ranks 102nd and Myanmar ranks 101st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyz Republic averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyz Republic | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.47 kg/ha | 10.89 kg/ha | 0.5824 kg/ha | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2000s | 17.53 kg/ha | 18.68 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 18.79 kg/ha | 21.36 kg/ha | 2.57 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 19.26 kg/ha | 19.57 kg/ha | 0.3121 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyz Republic or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 19.42 kg/ha against 19.25 kg/ha in Kyrgyz Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyz Republic and Myanmar?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyz Republic and Myanmar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyz Republic and Myanmar rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyz Republic ranks 102nd and Myanmar ranks 101st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).