Lesotho vs Sudan: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 4.65 kg/ha against 4.23 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 193rd and Sudan ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.7 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | 0.0818 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 4.6 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | 0.7374 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Lesotho or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 4.65 kg/ha against 4.23 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Lesotho and Sudan?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 193rd and Sudan ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).