Liberia vs Tuvalu: Outputs β Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Liberia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 10.7 kg/ha against 10.42 kg/ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.28 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Liberia ranks 167th and Tuvalu ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.34 kg/ha | 12.09 kg/ha | 6.75 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 7.02 kg/ha | 8.94 kg/ha | 1.92 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 7.84 kg/ha | 9.58 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 7.46 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 0.2085 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2000s | 9 kg/ha | 8.37 kg/ha | 0.6224 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2010s | 9.49 kg/ha | 8.59 kg/ha | 0.897 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2020s | 10.65 kg/ha | 10.89 kg/ha | 0.2347 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs β cropland potassium per unit area, Liberia or Tuvalu?
- Liberia, at 10.7 kg/ha against 10.42 kg/ha in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs β cropland potassium per unit area between Liberia and Tuvalu?
- 0.28 kg/ha, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Tuvalu rank globally for outputs β cropland potassium per unit area?
- Liberia ranks 167th and Tuvalu ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).