Luxembourg vs Sweden: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 14.57 kg/ha against 14.5 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 143rd and Sweden ranks 144th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.34 kg/ha | 16.32 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 16.32 kg/ha | 16.64 kg/ha | 0.3199 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 14.91 kg/ha | 16.95 kg/ha | 2.04 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Luxembourg, at 14.57 kg/ha against 14.5 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 143rd and Sweden ranks 144th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).