Mauritius vs Nepal: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 54.98 kg/ha against 52.47 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 2.51 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 80.41 kg/ha | 9.44 kg/ha | 70.97 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 80.19 kg/ha | 9.32 kg/ha | 70.87 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 77.09 kg/ha | 11.59 kg/ha | 65.5 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 83.54 kg/ha | 19.42 kg/ha | 64.12 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 83.85 kg/ha | 26.74 kg/ha | 57.11 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 74.6 kg/ha | 40.77 kg/ha | 33.83 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 51.57 kg/ha | 53.84 kg/ha | 2.27 kg/ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Mauritius or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 54.98 kg/ha against 52.47 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Mauritius and Nepal?
- 2.51 kg/ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Nepal rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).