Morocco vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Morocco
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 10.93 kg/ha against 10.6 kg/ha in Morocco, a difference of 0.33 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Morocco ranks 168th and Russian Federation ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.3 kg/ha | 5.58 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2000s | 9.37 kg/ha | 6.09 kg/ha | 3.28 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2010s | 12.18 kg/ha | 8.15 kg/ha | 4.04 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2020s | 11.77 kg/ha | 10.31 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Morocco or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 10.93 kg/ha against 10.6 kg/ha in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Morocco and Russian Federation?
- 0.33 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Morocco ranks 168th and Russian Federation ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).