New Caledonia vs Yugoslav SFR: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- New Caledonia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 20.08 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 97th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 94th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Yugoslav SFR in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27.01 kg/ha | 12.53 kg/ha | 14.48 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 19.09 kg/ha | 15.25 kg/ha | 3.84 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 13.75 kg/ha | 17.82 kg/ha | 4.07 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 13.2 kg/ha | 18.13 kg/ha | 4.93 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, New Caledonia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 20.08 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in New Caledonia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between New Caledonia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do New Caledonia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- New Caledonia ranks 97th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 94th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).