Panama vs Yugoslav SFR: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Panama
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 20.08 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 105th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.68 kg/ha | 12.53 kg/ha | 3.15 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1970s | 23.72 kg/ha | 15.25 kg/ha | 8.46 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1980s | 23.35 kg/ha | 17.82 kg/ha | 5.53 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1990s | 20.45 kg/ha | 18.13 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Panama or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 20.08 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in Panama as of 1991.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Panama and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Panama and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Panama ranks 105th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).