Poland vs Türkiye: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Poland
- Türkiye
How they compare
Poland currently reports 28.54 kg/ha against 27.48 kg/ha in Türkiye, a difference of 1.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 69th and Türkiye ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25.91 kg/ha | 7.27 kg/ha | 18.64 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1970s | 29.74 kg/ha | 9.58 kg/ha | 20.16 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1980s | 27.44 kg/ha | 13.04 kg/ha | 14.4 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1990s | 24.95 kg/ha | 16.49 kg/ha | 8.46 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 22.37 kg/ha | 18.73 kg/ha | 3.64 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 25.17 kg/ha | 22.95 kg/ha | 2.22 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 28.19 kg/ha | 26.27 kg/ha | 1.92 kg/ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Poland or Türkiye?
- Poland, at 28.54 kg/ha against 27.48 kg/ha in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Poland and Türkiye?
- 1.06 kg/ha, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Türkiye rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Poland ranks 69th and Türkiye ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).