Romania vs Uruguay: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Romania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Romania currently reports 16.67 kg/ha against 15.96 kg/ha in Uruguay, a difference of 0.71 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 128th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.21 kg/ha | 4.01 kg/ha | 6.2 kg/ha | Romania |
| 1970s | 13.75 kg/ha | 6.21 kg/ha | 7.54 kg/ha | Romania |
| 1980s | 16.86 kg/ha | 7.59 kg/ha | 9.28 kg/ha | Romania |
| 1990s | 13.43 kg/ha | 8.64 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | Romania |
| 2000s | 13.28 kg/ha | 13.47 kg/ha | 0.1975 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 17.81 kg/ha | 26.36 kg/ha | 8.55 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 16.98 kg/ha | 25.07 kg/ha | 8.09 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Romania or Uruguay?
- Romania, at 16.67 kg/ha against 15.96 kg/ha in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Romania and Uruguay?
- 0.71 kg/ha, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Uruguay rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Romania ranks 128th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).