Saudi Arabia vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Saudi Arabia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 6.9 kg/ha against 6.54 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.36 kg/ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 166th and South Sudan ranks 164th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.73 kg/ha | 5.47 kg/ha | 0.7356 kg/ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 6.33 kg/ha | 6.76 kg/ha | 0.4285 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Saudi Arabia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 6.9 kg/ha against 6.54 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Saudi Arabia and South Sudan?
- 0.36 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 166th and South Sudan ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).