Slovak Republic vs Sri Lanka: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Slovak Republic
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 25.78 kg/ha against 25.61 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 185 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.6 kg/ha | 25.13 kg/ha | 6.54 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 18.46 kg/ha | 26.42 kg/ha | 7.96 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 20.86 kg/ha | 28.55 kg/ha | 7.68 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 24.03 kg/ha | 29.15 kg/ha | 5.11 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Slovak Republic or Sri Lanka?
- Slovak Republic, at 25.78 kg/ha against 25.61 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Slovak Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovak Republic and Sri Lanka rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Slovak Republic ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).