Spain vs Sweden: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Spain
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 14.5 kg/ha against 13.84 kg/ha in Spain, a difference of 0.66 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Spain ranks 135th and Sweden ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.75 kg/ha | 12 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1970s | 10.92 kg/ha | 15.03 kg/ha | 4.1 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1980s | 13.39 kg/ha | 16.87 kg/ha | 3.47 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1990s | 14.47 kg/ha | 16.36 kg/ha | 1.89 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 16.97 kg/ha | 16.32 kg/ha | 0.6517 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 17.67 kg/ha | 16.64 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 17.82 kg/ha | 16.95 kg/ha | 0.8703 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland potassium per unit area, Spain or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 14.5 kg/ha against 13.84 kg/ha in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland potassium per unit area between Spain and Sweden?
- 0.66 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Sweden rank globally for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Spain ranks 135th and Sweden ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).